View Article  Constantine Hijacks Christ

 

Christ Series

 

DaVinci Code by Dan Brown, Excerpts

 

Constantine and the New Testament

Three centuries after the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, Christ’s followers had multiplied exponentially. Christians and pagans began warring, and the conflict grew to such proportions that it threatened to rend Rome in two. In Constantine’s day, Rome’s official religion was sun worship – the cult of Sol Invictus, or the Invincible Sun – and Constantine was its head priest. Unfortunately for him, a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome. Constantine decided something had to be done. In 325 AD, he decided to unify Rome under a single religion, Christianity. Historians still marvel at the brilliance with which Constantine converted the sun-worshipping pagans to Christianity.

 

To rewrite the history books, Constantine commissioned and financed a new Bible, which omitted those gospels that spoke of Christ’s human traits and embellished those gospels that made Him godlike. More than eighty gospels were considered for the New Testament, and yet only a relative few were chosen for inclusion – Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John among them. The earlier gospels were outlawed, gathered up, and burned. Any gospels that described earthly aspects of Jesus’ life were omitted from the Bible.

 

As part of the Vatican’s campaign to eradicate pagan religions and convert the masses to Christianity, the Church launched a smear campaign against the pagan gods and goddesses, recasting their divine symbols as evil. The newly emerging power took over the existing symbols and degraded them over time in an attempt to erase their meaning. In the battle between the pagan symbols and Christian symbols, the pagans lost; Poseidon’s trident became the devil’s pitchfork, the wise crone’s pointed hat became the symbol of a witch, and Venus’s pentacle became a sign of the devil. The symbolism of the pentacle has been distorted over the millennia through bloodshed.

 

Nothing in Christianity is original. By fusing pagan symbols, dates, and rituals into the growing Christian tradition, he created a kind of hybrid religion that was acceptable to both parties. The pre-Christian God Mithras – called the Son of God and the Light of the World – was born on December 25, died, and buried in a rock tomb, and then resurrected in three days. December 25 is also the birthday of Osiris, Adonis, and Dionysus. The newborn Krishna was presented with gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Even Christianity’s weekly holy day was stolen from the pagans. Originally Christianity honored the Jewish Sabbath of Saturday, but Constantine shifted it to coincide with the pagan’s veneration day of the sun – Sunday.

 

Egyptian sun disks became the halos of Catholic saints. Pictograms of Isis nursing her miraculously conceived son Horus became the blueprint for our modern images of the Virgin Mary nursing Baby Jesus. And virtually all the elements of the Catholic ritual – the miter, the altar, the doxology, and communion, the act of “God-eating” – were taken directly from earlier pagan mystery religions.

 

So strong was the Church’s fear of those who lived in the rural villes that the once innocuous word for “villager” – villain – came to mean a wicked soul. The term pagan became synonymous with devil worship – a gross misconception.

 

Catholic Clergy Demonize Women

The Vatican tried to bury the secret in the fourth century. Magdalene was recast as whore in order to erase evidence of her powerful family ties. Magdalene was no prostitute. That misconception is the legacy of a smear campaign launched by the early Church. That’s part of what the Crusades were about, gathering and destroying information. The threat Mary Magdalene posed to the men of the early Church was potentially ruinous. Not only was she the woman to whom Jesus had assigned the task of founding the Church, but she also had physical proof that the Church’s newly proclaimed deity had spawned a mortal bloodline. The Church perpetuated her image as a whore and buried evidence of Christ’s marriage to her, thereby defusing any potential claims that Christ had a surviving bloodline and was a mortal prophet.

 

For the early Church, mankind’s use of sex to commune directly with God posed a serious threat to the Catholic power base. It left the Church out of the loop, undermining their self-proclaimed status as the sole conduit to God. For obvious reasons, they worked hard to demonize sex and recast it as a disgusting and sinful act.

 

The Catholic Inquisition published the book that arguably could be called the most blood-soaked publication in human history. Mallleus Maleficarum – or The Witche’s Hammer – indoctrinated the world to “the dangers of freethinking women’ and instructed the clergy how to locate, torture, and destroy them. Those deemed “witches” by the Church included all female scholars, priestesses, gypsies, mystics, nature lovers, herb gatherers, and any women “suspiciously attuned to the natural world.” Midwives also were killed for their heretical practice of using medical knowledge to ease the pain of childbirth – a suffering, the Church claimed, that was God’s rightful punishment for Eve’s partaking of the Apple of Knowledge, thus giving birth to the idea of Original Sin. During three hundred years of witch hunts, the Church burned at the stake an astounding five million women.

 

Women, once celebrated as an essential half of spiritual enlightenment, have been banished from the temples of the world. There are no female Orthodox rabbis, Catholic priests, nor Islamic clerics. Holy men who had once required sexual union with their female counterparts to commune with God have feared their natural sexual urges as the work of the devil, collaborating with his favorite accomplice … woman.

 

Not even the feminine association with the left-hand side could escape the Church’s defamation. In France and Italy, the words for “left” gauche and sinistra – came to have deeply negative overtones, while their right-hand counterparts rang of righteousness, dexterity, and correctness. To this day, radical thought was considered left wing; irrational thought was left brain, and anything evil, sinister.

 

View Article  Santa and Coca-Cola

 

Coca-Cola Series

 

For God, Country, and Coca-Cola by Mark Pendergrast, 1999

 

 

Coca-Cola bottlers have always known that they had to snare the next generation of drinkers early, regardless of the taboo on direct advertising to those below twelve. One approach directed at children wound up reshaping American culture through the art of Haddon Sundblom. A hard-drinking Swede whose work was brilliant but usually late, “Sunny” made himself indispensable, regardless of his habits, by creating the classic Coca-Cola Santa Claus in 1931. Sundblom’s Santa was the perfect Coca-Cola man – bigger than life, bright red, eternally jolly, and caught in whimsical situations involving a well-known soft drink as his reward for a hard night’s work of toy delivery. Every Christmas, Sundblom delivered another eagerly awaited Coca-Cola Santa ad. When his first model, a retired Coca-Cola salesman, died, Sundblom used himself. While Coca-Cola has had a subtle, pervasive influence on our culture, it has directly shaped the way we think of Santa. Prior to the Sundblom illustrations, the Christmas saint had been variously illustrated wearing blue, yellow, green, and red. In European art, he was usually tall and gaunt, whereas Clement Moore had depicted him as an elf in “A Visit from St. Nicholas.” After the soft drink ads, Santa would forever more be a huge, fat, relentlessly happy man with broad belt and black hip boots – and he would wear Coca-Cola red.

 

 

View Article  Bloodline of Jesus

 

Christ Series

 

Below are excerpts of several books that suggest a bloodline of Christ. Kathleen McGowan's  version of John the Bapist is thought provoking. The book itself starts out like a C+ DaVinci Code thriller; however, the book redeems itself in Mary's gospel. Look forward to her forthcoming book, Book of Love.

 

The Expected One by Kathleen McGowan, 2006

 

Mary Magdalene

The only daughter in the lineage of Benjamin, her future had been carved out since her infancy. Hers was the privileged destiny of royal blood and prophecy that had been foretold by the great prophets of Israel – a marriage that was believed was no less than the absolute will of God.

 

High Priests Pick Mary’s Husband -- John

Annas to Jesus: “You have brought this about yourself by aligning with the Zealots. The Romans will never allow us to show any kind of alliance with you because of the assassins and revolutionaries among your supporters. We would be inviting slaughter on our own people.”

 

Water to Wine – Mary Weds John

The wedding of Mary, the daughter of the house of Benjamin, and John the Baptizer, from the priestly lineage of Aaron and Zadok, took place on the hill of Cana in Galilee. It was well attended by nobles, Nazarenes, and Pharisees. Jesus attended with his mother, his brothers, and a group of their disciples. Caiaphas, who officiated the ceremony, lifted his glass to John, the bridegroom, and praised him for the quality of the wine.

 

Following the wedding of John and Mary, no one was speaking of the bride and bridegroom. Indeed, the dynastic merge had been completely overshadowed by the discussion among the common people of the miraculous transformation of water into wine by the younger prophet.

 

Unhappy Marriage

John wanted only to remain in the wilderness and do God’s work. He would abide by the law, which required men to be fruitful and multiply, and visit his wife at the appropriate times for reasons of procreation. But other than those periods specifically dictated by law and tradition, he had no interest in keeping company of any woman.

 

John would not allow Mary to be in the presence of Nazarene teachings. She would not be allowed to visit the home of the Great Mary, her most revered teacher and friend. And she would certainly never appear in public where Jesus was speaking. John was rankled by the fact that some of his own disciples had left the banks of the Jordan to follow his cousin Jesus.

 

Young, naive, and never exposed to anything by love and acceptance, Mary attempted to argue this with John, but met the first of her husband’s blows as she tried to object. John’s hand left an imprint on Mary’s cheek as a firm reinforcement that she would not argue with him about matters of obedience. He was a rough man who had never asked for what was pressed upon him, never intended to take a wife. She did her best to behave in a way that John would determine was obedient, but nothing about her ever pleased him.

 

John is Arrested - Beheaded

John the Baptizer was a troubling prisoner. Herod Antipas had not anticipated the strength of John’s following, which had grown to extraordinary proportions. Petitioners flooded the palace each day, demanding the release of their prophet. They appealed to Herod as a Jew, begging his sympathy as one of their own. To release the man would make Herod appear inconsistent and perhaps even incompetent to deal with Jewish insurgents.

 

John continued his ministry from prison, where his legend and his influence grew in the southern region. But the ministry of his cousin, the charismatic Nazarene, blossomed with increased vigor in the area north of Jordan and into Galilee. John’s followers brought word to him in prison of Jesus’ great works and of the miraculous healings that were attributed to him. But they also told of the Nazarene’s continued leniency toward gentiles and the unclean.

 

Herod Antipas had a problem. The Roman envoy who had witnesses the arrest warrant for John the Baptizer months earlier had returned. When the Roman asked the tetrarch’s officials why there were so many Jews surrounding the palace, he was told that the imprisoned prophet continued to attract followers. Herod knew when he was cornered. This envoy was returning to Rome the following day, and he could not risk the man reporting any perceived weakness to Caesar.

 

Before his execution, John asked for just one thing – that a message be sent to his wife in Galilee. He was allowed to receive one follower to act as a courier. To him, John gave his final words of instruction and repentance before the centurion’s sword fell swiftly. The head was severed from the body with the first blow, and John the Baptizer, prophet of the Jordan, was sent to the kingdom of God. It was to a heavily pregnant Mary that word was brought of John’s execution.

 

Herod had John’s head mounted on a pike and displayed high at the front of the gate of the palace to show the Roman envoy how swiftly and severely he would deal with treason. It stayed there until it had been picked clean by scavenging birds, but disappeared mysteriously one night.

 

Birth of John’s Child

Mary of Magdala sent word to the Great Mary and to Jesus that her child had been delivered safely, along with her thanks for their welcome prayers. She named the child John-Joseph, after his father.

 

Difference of Philosophies: John vs Jesus

After John’s execution, tremendous pressure was put upon Jesus to take a position among the followers. He went into the desert place and met with the Essenes and John’s disciples, preaching the kingdom of God in his own way. Some among the Essenes accepted Jesus as their new messiah and followed him because he was of the line of David. Yet many others were opposed to his Nazarene reforms because John had spoken harshly of these things at the end of his life. For the majority of the desert dwellers, John was the one and only Teacher of Righteousness, and anyone who tried to take his position was an imposter. The followers of John the Baptizer ignited a conflagration that has burnt through thousands of years.

 

The deep division between those who would follow John and those who would be faithful to Jesus was fashioned in these early days. The Nazarene spirit emerged as one of love and forgiveness, and was accessible to anyone who chose to embrace it. The Johannnite philosophy was a very different one, based on harsh judgments and strict rules of law. Where women were welcomed and honored by Jesus and the Nazarenes, they were reviled by the followers of John. John had always held women in low esteem.

 

Jesus Marries John’s Widow

Word of the union spread quickly, and the following day, throngs of people began arriving in Tabga. Some were followers, some merely curious at the idea of the bride and bridegroom of Solomon’s prophecy coming together. Others were not pleased at the idea of their beloved Galilean prophet joining with this woman of tarnished reputations.

 

All who feasted on the shores of Tabga that day were convinced beyond any doubt that Jesus the

Nazarene was truly the messiah of prophecy. His reputation as a great worker of miracles as well as a healer continued to spread, as did his following among the common people. And many more were inclined to accept Mary at this time. Surely if so great a prophet had chosen this woman, she must be worthy.

 

Birth of Sarah

A perfect, tiny daughter was delivered to Mary and Jesus upon their return to Galilee. They gave her the double name of a princess, Sarah-Tamar. The name Sarah invoked a noble Hebrew woman of scripture, the wife of Abraham. Tamar was Galilean name; it made reference to the abundant date palm trees that grew in the region, and had been used by royal houses for generations as a pet name for their daughters.

 

Mary Pregnant at Crucifixion

“I will let the world know that you are my most beloved disciple. This child you carry, this son of ours, he has the blood of prophets and kings, as our daughter does. Their descendants shall take their place in the world, preaching the kingdom of God and the words contained within the Book of Love so that all people will know peace and justice the world over. This child has a special destiny in the western islands where the word of the The Way will spread. I have given my uncle, Joseph, instructions on this child’s upbringing. And you must name him Yeshua-David, in memory of me and the founder of our royal line. The greatest king to rule on earth will come from his blood.”

 

Fate of John-Joseph, Son of John the Baptist

One legend says that the more fanatic followers of John sought out his heir in Rome and convinced him that the Christians had usurped his rightful place. That John was the one true messiah and John-Joseph as his only son was the heir to the throne of the anointed one. Some say that John-Joseph turned on his mother and his family to embrace the teaching of his father’s followers. We don’t know where he ended up, but we do know that there is an intense sect of John worshipers in Iran and Iraq, called the Mandaeans. Peaceful people, but very strict in their laws and in their belief that John was the only true messiah. It is possible that they may be direct descendants.

 

 

The Woman with the Alabaster Jar by Margaret Starbird, 1993

After the crucifixion of Jesus, Mary the Magdalene found it necessary to flee for the sake of her unborn child to the nearest refuge. The influential friend of Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea, could very will have been her protector. The child was born in Egypt. Egypt was the traditional place of asylum for Jews whose safety was threatened in Israel.

 

This Sarah is further characterized in local legends as “young,” no more than a child. So we have, in a tiny coastal town in France, a yearly festival in honor of a young, dark-skinned girl-child called Sarah. The fossil in this legend is that the child is called “princess” in Hebrew. A child of Jesus, born after Mary’s flight to Alexandria, would have been about twelve years of age at the time of the voyage to Gaul recorded in the legend.

 

Heretical sects of Christianity believed that Jesus was fully human and married, that his royal blood still flowed in the veins of the noble families of Provence, and that the messianic promises of the Hebrew Scriptures would someday be fulfilled in a descendant of Jesus. The royal bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene eventually flowed in the veins of the Merovingian monarchs of France. The royal bloodline of Israel survived persecution and eventually surfaced in the Merovingians of Europe and in related families that guarded their secret genealogies through the centuries.

 

The Holy Grail was said to be the vessel that once contained the blood of Jesus. The Grail heresy implied that certain families in southern France could be traced back to Jesus and Mary Magdalene. The legend promises that the restored Grail will have the power to heal the wasteland. When it is returned to the crippled Fisher King, it will heal his woundedness, the source of the desolation that plagues his realm. And the Grail is the lost feminine – the Sister-Bride of Christianity, the wife of Jesus.

 

DaVinci Code by Dan Brown

 

Christ as Messiah

Jesus Christ was a historical figure of staggering influence, perhaps the most enigmatic and inspirational leader the world has ever seen. As the prophesized Messiah, Jesus toppled kings, inspired millions, and founded new philosophies. As a descendant of the lines of King Solomon and King David, Jesus possessed a rightful claim to the throne of the King of the Jews. His life was recorded by thousands of followers across the land.

 

Christ as Messiah was critical to the functioning of Church and state. By officially endorsing Jesus as the Son of God, Constantine turned Jesus into a deity who existed beyond the scope of the human world, an entity whose power was unchallengeable. This not only precluded further pagan challenges to Christianity, but now followers of Christ were able to redeem themselves only via the established channel – the Roman Catholic Church. The early church literally stole Jesus from His original followers, hijacking His human message, shrouding it in an impenetrable cloak of divinity, and using it to expand their own power.

 

Some of the gospels that Constantine attempted to eradicate managed to survive - The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in the 1950s hidden in a cave near Qumran in the Judean desert and The Coptic Scrolls in 1945 at Nag Hammadi. These documents speak of Christ’s ministry in very human terms. One particularly troubling earthly theme kept recurring in the gospels, Magdalene’s marriage to Jesus Christ. A child of Jesus would undermine the critical notion of Christ’s divinity and therefore the Christian Church, which declared itself the sole vessel through which humanity could access the divine and gain entrance to the kingdom of heaven.

 

Mary Magdalene

Mary Magdalene was of royal decent, the House of Benjamin. Jesus was of the House of David, a descendent of King Solomon – King of the Jews. By marrying into the powerful House of Benjamin, Jesus fused two royal bloodlines, creating a potent political union with the potential of making a legitimate claim to the throne and restoring the line of kings as it was under Solomon.

 

Mary Magdalene was pregnant at the time of the crucifixion. For the safety of Christ’s unborn child, she had no choice but to flee the Holy Land. With the help of Jesus’ trusted uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, Mary Magdalene secretly traveled to France, then known as Gaul. There she found safe refuge in the Jewish community. It was here in France that she gave birth to a daughter. Her name was Sarah.

 

Magdalene’s and Sarah’s lives were scrutinously chronicled by their Jewish protectors. Magdalene’s child belonged to the lineage of Jewish kings – David and Solomon. The Jews in France considered Magdalene sacred royalty and revered her as the progenitor of the royal line of kings. There exists a family tree of Jesus Christ.

 

 

 
View Article  Calcata: Home to the Holy Prepuce

 

 

Circumcision Series - World's Most Controversial Surgery

 

Christ Series

 

Circumcision by David Gollaher, 2000, Edited Excerpts

According to legends of the village of Calcata, in 1527 a soldier in the German army sacking of Rome looted the Sancta Sanctorum; when he was eventually captured in the village he hid the jeweled reliquary containing the Holy Prepuce in his cell, where it was discovered in 1557 and officially venerated by the Church since that time, offering a ten year indulgence to pilgrims. Calcata thus became a popular site for pilgrimage.

 

At some point, however, the relic went missing, and remained lost until 1856 when a workman repairing the abbey of Charoux claimed to have found a reliquary hidden inside a wall, containing the missing foreskin. The rediscovery, however, led to a theological clash with the established Holy Prepuce of Calcata, which had been officially venerated by the Church for hundreds of years; in, the church solved the dilemma by ruling that anyone thenceforward writing or speaking of the Holy Prepuce would be excommunicated. In 1594, after much debate, the punishment was changed to the harsher degree of excommunication, vitandi (shunned); and the Second Vatican Council later removed the Day of the Holy Circumcision from the church calendar

 

Nevetheless, the village continued to stage an annual procession on the Day of the Holy Circumcision to honor the relic. In 1983, however, parish priest Dario Magnoni announced that “This year, the holy relic will not be exposed to the devotion of the faithful. It has vanished. Sacrilegious thieve have taken it form my home”, where it had reportedly been kept in a shoebox in the back of a wardrobe. Citing the Vatican’s decre of excommunication, Magnoni refuses to further discuss the event, as does the Vatican. As a result, villager’ theories of the crime vary from theft for lucrative resale to an effort by the Vatican to quietly put an end to the practice it had attempted to end by excommunication years ago; some going so far as to speculate that Magnoni himself may have been the culprit.

 

Fore Shame, Did the Vatican Steal Jesus’ Foreskin so People would Shut Up about the Saviors Penis?

http://www.slate.com/id/2155745/

Dec 19, 2006

 
View Article  The French Revolution and Hyper-Inflation

 

The Zimbabwe Experience - Real Time

 

Fiat Money Inflation in France by A.D. White, 1914, Excerpts

A.D White LL.D. [Yale, St. Andrews and John Hopkins], Ph.D. [Jena], D.C.L. [Oxford], Late President and Professor of History at Cornell University

 

From the early reluctant and careful issues of paper we saw, as an immediate result, improvement and activity in business. Then arose the clamor for more paper money. At first, new issues were made with great difficulty; but, the dyke once broken, the current of irredeemable currency poured through was soon swollen beyond control. It was urged on by speculators for a rise in values by demagogues who persuaded the mob that a notion, by its simple fiat, could stamp real value to any amount upon valueless objects. As a natural consequence a great debtor class grew rapidly, and this class gave its influence to depreciate more and more the currency in which its debts were to be paid.

 

Manufactures at first received a great impulse, but this overproduction and over stimulus proved as fatal to them as to commerce. From time to time there was revival of hope caused by an apparent revival of business; but this revival of business was at last seen to be caused more and more by the desire of far-seeing and cunning men of affairs to exchange paper money for objects of permanent value. As to the people at large, the classes living on fixed incomes and small salaries felt the pressure first, as soon as the purchasing power of their fixed incomes was reduced. Soon the great class living on wages felt it even more sadly.

 

Prices of the necessities of life increased: merchants were obliged to increase them, not only to cover depreciation of their merchandise, but also to cover their risk of loss from fluctuation; and while the prices of products thus rose, wages, which had at first gone up, under the general stimulus, lagged behind. The demand for labor was diminished; laboring men were thrown out of employment, and, under the operation of the simplest law of supply and demand, the price of labor went down until, at a time when prices of food, clothing and various articles of consumption were enormous, wages were nearly as low at the time preceding the first issue of irredeemable currency.

 

The mercantile classes at first thought themselves exempt from the general misfortune. They were delighted at the apparent advance in the value of the goods upon their shelves. But they soon found that, as they increased prices to cover the inflation of currency and the risk from fluctuation and uncertainty, purchases became less in amount and payments, less sure; a feeling of insecurity spread throughout the country; enterprise was deadened and stagnation followed.

 

Out of the inflation of prices grew a speculating class; and, in the complete uncertainty as to the future, all business became a game of chance, and all businessmen, gamblers. In city centers came a quick growth of stockjobbers and speculators; and these set a debasing fashion in business which spread to the remotest parts of the country. Instead of satisfaction with legitimate profits, came a passion for inordinate gains. Then, too, as values became more and more uncertain, there was no longer any motive for care or economy, but every motive for immediate expenditure and present enjoyment. So came upon the nation the obliteration of thrift. In this mania for yielding to present enjoyment rather than providing for future comfort were the seeds of new growths of wretchedness: luxury, senseless and extravagant, set in: this, too, spread as a fashion. To feed it, there came cheatery in the nation at large and corruption among officials and persons holding trusts. While men set such fashions in private and official business, women set fashions of extravagance in dress and living that added to the incentives to corruption. Faith in moral considerations, or even in good impulses, yielded to general distrust. National honor was thought a fiction cherished only by hypocrites. Patriotism was eaten out by cynicism.

 

When Bonaparte took the consulship the condition of fiscal affairs was appalling. The government was bankrupt; an immense debt was unpaid. The further collection of taxes seemed impossible; the assessments were in hopeless confusion. War was going on in the East, on the Rhine, and in Italy, and civil war, in LaVendee. All the armies had long been unpaid, and the largest loan that could for the moment be affected was for a sum hardly meeting the expenses of the government for a single day.

 

When the first great European coalition was formed against the Empire, Napoleon was hard pressed financially, and it was proposed to resort to paper money; but he wrote to his minister, “While I live I will never resort to irredeemable paper.” He never did, and France, under this determination, commanded all the gold she needed.

 

There is a lesson in all this that behooves every thinking man to ponder.

 

 

France unveils huge stimulus plan

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7764673.stm

4 December 2008

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has unveiled a 26bn-euro ($33bn; £23bn) stimulus plan to help France fend off financial crisis.

 

US Fed announces $800bn stimulus

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7748362.stm

25 November 2008

The Federal Reserve is to inject another $800bn (£526.8bn) into the US economy in a further effort to stabilize the financial system.

 

India unveils $4bn stimulus plan

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7770126.stm

7 December 2008

India has announced $4bn (£2.72bn) in extra spending to boost its economy as the global financial crisis unfolds.