View Article  Bankers to the Rescue -- Repeating Story

Bail-out hope sends shares higher

1 October 2008

US shares clawed back some of Monday's heavy losses, after President George W Bush renewed calls for Congress to back a $700bn (£380bn) banking rescue plan. With Wall Street having seen record falls after politicians blocked the deal, the Dow Jones index rose 485 points or 4.7% by the close of trading. The House's rejection of the bail-out plan came after a day of turmoil in the US and Europe, with Wachovia, the fourth-largest US bank, being bought by larger rival Citigroup. Monday also saw the partial nationalization of Benelux banking giant Fortis by three governments, and UK lender Bradford & Bingley was taken into state ownership.

 

Bail-out fears return to markets

23 September 2008

Concern returned to the US stock market as US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson faced tough questions about his $700bn (£382bn) financial rescue plan.

 

Morgan Stanley in 20% stake sale

22 September 2008

Morgan Stanley shares surged after Japanese banking giant Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group said it would buy a stake in the bruised Wall Street bank. The Japanese group said the stake will account for 10% to 20% of Morgan Stanley's common shares. The deal, estimated to be worth around $8.5bn, comes shortly after Morgan Stanley was granted approval by the Federal Reserve to change its status to become a bank holding company, which allows it to grow its deposits to raise funds.

 

The radical move, which was taken by Goldman Sachs [Henry Paulson, former CEO of Goldman Sachs], too, marks the end of the independent investment bank on Wall Street, which aggressively grew profits using money borrowed from the bond market - a model which is now in tatters.

 

Paulson wants a speedy debt deal

21 September 2008

Henry Paulson has urged Congress to move quickly to pass a $700bn (£382bn) package to tackle the worst financial crisis for decades. The US Treasury Secretary plans to set up a fund to buy back much of the bad debt held by banks and financial institutions around the world.

 

Bear Stearns gets emergency funds

14 March 2008

US bank Bear Stearns has got emergency funding, in a move that raises fears that one of Wall Street's biggest names is on the verge of collapsing. JP Morgan Chase will provide the money to Bear Stearns for 28 days with the Federal Reserve of New York's backing. JP Morgan is also trying to get long-term financing for Bear Stearns.

 

Central banks fight credit crisis

11 March 2008

The world's largest central banks have launched their latest co-ordinated action to calm jittery credit markets. The US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and central banks in the UK, Canada and Switzerland will inject billions of dollars into money markets. The news cheered investors and US stocks surged more than 3% - their biggest one-day gain in five years. The injection of more than $200bn is aimed at easing the credit crunch and its impact on the wider economy.

 

 

The House of Morgan by Ron Chernow, 1990

 

On October 22, 1929, the president sent a frantic messenger to Lamont [Morgan Stanley] expressing concern about the "speculative situation which seemed to him to be running very wild." The next day panic selling hit selected blue chips, with Westinghouse dropping 35 points and General Electric 20. The balloon was about to burst. The following morning, Winston Churchill stood in the visitors' gallery of the New York Stock Exchange. Within the first two hours of trading, almost $10 billion was lost on paper. The drops posted were so sharp and the resulting shrieks so fearful that the gallery was closed by late morning.

 

Desperate men stood on the steps of Federal Hall, hands in their pockets, their hats pulled low, staring grimly ahead. They stood six deep outside the Stock Exchange. Having bought on margin, many investors were ruined outright. Newspapers noted a strange noise filtering through the canyons of the Street - a roar, a hum, a murmur. It was the cumulative sound of thousands of stunned people giving vent to their feelings. Violence was in the air.

 

The Morgan role in rescues was now automatic. The bankers' rescue on Black Thursday proved longer on symbolism than on substance. The men knew they couldn't prop up a collapsing stock market, so they tried to introduce liquidity and engineer an orderly decline. So they pledged $240 million to buy up assorted stocks and stabilize the market.

 

At the end of the trading day, the bankers regrouped for a second meeting and designated Lamont their spokesman. Almost at once, Wall Street began to issue bravely hopeful statements. The headlines in the Wall Street Journal the next morning featured not the crash but the rescue: "BANKERS HALT STOCK DEBACLE 2-HOUR SELLING DELUGES STOPPED AFTER CONFERENCE AT MORGAN'S OFFICE" $1,000,000,000 FOR SUPPORT." The market staggered through Friday and Saturday morning trading without a fresh crisis.

 

On Tragic Tuesday, October 29, investors looked back on Black Thursday as a halcyon time. On this worst day in market history, the ticker lagged two and a half hours behind. Unlike Black Thursday, Tragic Tuesday exposed the bankers' frailty. Lamont now faced a more hostile group of reporters. As if expressing a new bunker mentality, the Stock Exchange governors met on Tragic Tuesday in a basement room under the Exchange floor. The main topic was whether to shut the market. As in 1897, the group decided to shorten Exchange hours instead.

 

As it happens, the real remedial action that was taken came not from the old Wall Street club but by a force new to financial panics - the Federal Reserve. In late October, Jack chaired a meeting at the Morgan Library with George Harrison, Ben Strong's successor at the New York Fed, son of an army officer, a graduate of Yale and Harvard Law School. Harrison lowered interest rates and pumped in billions of dollars in credit to buoy banks with heavy loans to brokers. He bought up to $100 million in government bonds per day and made sure Wall Street banks had adequate reserves with which to deal with the emergency.

 

Wall Street tried to face the crash with stoic fortitude and treat it as a stern but salutary lesson. Everybody sounded philosophical. In late 1929, Lamont described the crisis as an unpleasant warning of no lasting harm: "I cannot but feel that it may after all be a valuable lesson and the experience gained may be turned to our future advantage. There has never been a time when business as a whole was on a sounder basis." This reasonable approach reflected a belief that the financial trouble had ended; in fact, it had just begun.

 

From a rate of 60 bank failures a month in early 1930, the figure snowballed to 254 in November and 344 in December 1930. There were over a thousand bank failures for the year. The failure of the Bank of United States was the largest thus far and threatened more general ruin, its bankruptcy fed a psychology of fear that already gripped depositors across the country.

 

The Wall Street of 1932 was a dismal ghost town. After falling for over two straight years, the stock market hit bottom on July 8, 1932. By that point, two thousand investment houses had failed, and new underwritings stood at 10 percent of their 1929 peak volume. Securities firms declared "apple days" - unpaid vacation days each month that enable destitute brokers to go out and supplement their income by selling apples on the sidewalk.

 

In 1932, almost thirteen million of America's 125 million people were unemployed. Two million roamed America searching for work, boarding boxcars and sleeping in hobo camps. Hoover refused to renounce economic orthodoxy and mount a vigorous attack on the Depression. The age had come to an abrupt, calamitous end. The crash was a blow to Wall Street's pride and its profits. The Depression would unleash a popular fury against bankers that would rage for years.

 

 

 
View Article  Public Opinion Marketing Series

 

Edward Bernays is considered the Father of Public Relations, the master at manipulating public opinion. And when it comes to public opinion in today’s world, nothing is left to chance. After working on the Creel Commission during WWI, he orchestrated public relation campaigns that are now legend. His mother was Sigmund Freud’s sister, and his father’s sister was Sigmund Freud’s wife. With a solid background in psychoanalysis from the Father of Psychoanalysis himself, Bernays also studied mass psychology from Walter Lippmann, who was the first to coin the term ‘Manufacturing Consent’. Bernays applied both disciplines of thought to public relations with a commercial intent hidden from public view.

 

Who else is more qualified than Bernays to have written a book titled Propaganda?

 

 

Public Relations: aka Public Opinion, National Will, Group Mind, and Social Purpose.

 

Propaganda by Edward Bernays, 1928

 

Propaganda

Mass Psychology

Intelligent Few

Invisible Government

 

Father of Spin, Edward L. Bernays and the Birth of Public Relation by Larry Tye, 1998

 

Father of Spin

Torches of Freedom - Women and Tobacco

The Green Ball

United Fruit Company, Bernays, and Guatemala

 

Other catchy monikers for Edward Bernays:

 

The Baron of Ballyhoo

Sire of the Big Sell

Master of Mass Psychology

High Priest of Press Agents

Pontiff of Publicity

Pope of Propaganda

Prince of Propaganda

Prince of Puff

 

Lots of videos on Youtube relating to Bernays.

 

 Public Opinion by Walter Lippman, 1921 

The skillful propagandist knows that you must start with a plausible analysis and then stoke up energy by brandishing a passport to heaven.” -- Lippmann

 

Public Opinion

Social Sets and the Organization

Tools to Shape Public Opinion

Manufacturing Consent

The Creel Commission

 

 Media Control by Noam Chomsky, 2002

 

Media Control

Lippmann and the Bewildered Herd

 

Manufacturing Consent by Herman and Chomsky, 1988

 

Slan by Van Vogt, 1940

 

Tell the Truth - Mos Def - Immortal Technique – Eminem

 

Marketing and Psychology

 

Tipping Point

Influence of Persuasion

Connectors, Mavens, and Salesmen

 

 

 
View Article  Obama Confirms Growth Mantra

 

Obama Series

 

McCain Obama Debate, University of Mississippi

26 September 09 

Obama:

So my attitude is, we've got to grow the economy from the bottom up.

 

And over time, that, I think, is going to be a better recipe for economic growth than the -- the policies of President Bush that John McCain wants to -- wants to follow.

 

No. 2, we've got to deal with a growing poppy trade that has exploded over the last several years.

 Interestingly, McCain never mentioned 'grow', indicating, through his own admission, that he really doesn't get economics.

 

 

Barack Obama’s Acceptance Speech

Aug 28, 2008, Democratic Convention

 

It's a promise that says the market should reward drive and innovation and generate growth, but that businesses should live up to their responsibilities to create American jobs, to look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road.

 

Now, many of these plans will cost money, which is why I've laid out how I'll pay for every dime: by closing corporate loopholes and tax havens that don't help America grow.

 

 

Obama In Berlin 07/24/08

 

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92875642#92875486

 

This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably. Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. Together, we must forge trade that truly rewards the work that creates wealth, with meaningful protections for our people and our planet. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all.

View Article  Bush's Speech Economic Crisis -- Color Coded Transcript

“There is a spirit of cooperation between Democrats and Republicans and between Congress and this administration. I know that Americans sometimes get discouraged by the tone in Washington and the seemingly endless partisan struggles, yet history has shown that, in times of real trial, elected officials rise to the occasion.”

 

And when it comes to the trials of money, they do unite. Growth is faltering, finance is growth dependent, these guys have the most to lose, panic is setting in, and they come together, as one. One thing is for sure, they will make us share their pain one way or another.

 

So here is a color coded analysis of Bush’s speech. It’s all about the form of money.

 

Blue: economy, market, money [Elemental to every social/monetary system]

Red: finance, credit, borrow, mortgage, loan [Instruments of interest/usury]

Yellow: Grow [Without growth, the red collapses]

 

 

President George W. Bush's speech to the nation on the economic crisis -- Transcript

 

24 September 2008

 

Good evening. This is an extraordinary period for America's economy.

 

Over the past few weeks, many Americans have felt anxiety about their finances and their future. I understand their worry and their frustration.

 

We've seen triple-digit swings in the stock market. Major financial institutions have teetered on the edge of collapse, and some have failed. As uncertainty has grown, many banks have restricted lending, credit markets have frozen, and families and businesses have found it harder to borrow money.

 

We're in the midst of a serious financial crisis, and the federal government is responding with decisive action.

 

We boosted confidence in money market mutual funds and acted to prevent major investors from intentionally driving down stocks for their own personal gain.

 

Most importantly, my administration is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets.

 

Financial assets related to home mortgages have lost value during the house decline, and the banks holding these assets have restricted credit. As a result, our entire economy is in danger.

 

So I propose that the federal government reduce the risk posed by these troubled assets and supply urgently needed money so banks and other financial institutions can avoid collapse and resume lending.

 

This rescue effort is not aimed at preserving any individual company or industry. It is aimed at preserving America's overall economy.

 

It will help American consumers and businesses get credit to meet their daily needs and create jobs. And it will help send a signal to markets around the world that America's financial system is back on track.

 

I know many Americans have questions tonight: How did we reach this point in our economy? How will the solution I propose work? And what does this mean for your financial future?

 

These are good questions, and they deserve clear answers.

 

First, how did our economy reach this point? Well, most economists agree that the problems we're witnessing today developed over a long period of time. For more than a decade, a massive amount of money flowed into the United States from investors abroad because our country is an attractive and secure place to do business.

 

This large influx of money to U.S. banks and financial institutions, along with low interest rates, made it easier for Americans to get credit. These developments allowed more families to borrow money for cars, and homes, and college tuition, some for the first time. They allowed more entrepreneurs to get loans to start new businesses and create jobs.

 

Unfortunately, there were also some serious negative consequences, particularly in the housing market. Easy credit, combined with the faulty assumption that home values would continue to rise, led to excesses and bad decisions.

 

Many mortgage lenders approved loans for borrowers without carefully examining their ability to pay. Many borrowers took out loans larger than they could afford, assuming that they could sell or refinance their homes at a higher price later on.

 

Optimism about housing values also led to a boom in home construction. Eventually, the number of new houses exceeded the number of people willing to buy them. And with supply exceeding demand, housing prices fell, and this created a problem.

 

BUSH: Borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages, who had been planning to sell or refinance their homes at a higher price, were stuck with homes worth less than expected, along with mortgage payments they could not afford.

 

As a result, many mortgage-holders began to default. These widespread defaults had effects far beyond the housing market.

 

See, in today's mortgage industry, home loans are often packaged together and converted into financial products called mortgage-backed securities. These securities were sold to investors around the world.

 

Many investors assumed these securities were trustworthy and asked few questions about their actual value. Two of the leading purchasers of mortgage-backed securities were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

 

Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk.

 

The decline in the housing market set off a domino effect across our economy. When home values declined, borrowers defaulted on their mortgages, and investors holding mortgage-backed securities began to incur serious losses.

 

Before long, these securities became so unreliable that they were not being bought or sold. Investment banks, such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, found themselves saddled with large amounts of assets they could not sell. They ran out of money needed to meet their immediate obligations, and they faced imminent collapse.

 

Other banks found themselves in severe financial trouble. These banks began holding on to their money, and lending dried up, and the gears of the American financial system began grinding to a halt.

 

With the situation becoming more precarious by the day, I faced a choice, to step in with dramatic government action or to stand back and allow the irresponsible actions of some to undermine the financial security of all.

 

I'm a strong believer in free enterprise, so my natural instinct is to oppose government intervention. I believe companies that make bad decisions should be allowed to go out of business. Under normal circumstances, I would have followed this course. But these are not normal circumstances. The market is not functioning properly. There has been a widespread loss of confidence, and major sectors of America's financial system are at risk of shutting down.

 

The government's top economic experts warn that, without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario would unfold.

 

More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically.

 

And if you own a business or a farm, you would find it harder and more expensive to get credit. More businesses would close their doors, and millions of Americans could lose their jobs.

 

Even if you have good credit history, it would be more difficult for you to get the loans you need to buy a car or send your children to college. And, ultimately, our country could experience a long and painful recession.

 

Fellow citizens, we must not let this happen. I appreciate the work of leaders from both parties in both houses of Congress to address this problem and to make improvements to the proposal my administration sent to them.

 

There is a spirit of cooperation between Democrats and Republicans and between Congress and this administration. In that spirit, I've invited Senators McCain and Obama to join congressional leaders of both parties at the White House tomorrow to help speed our discussions toward a bipartisan bill.

 

I know that an economic rescue package will present a tough vote for many members of Congress. It is difficult to pass a bill that commits so much of the taxpayers' hard-earned money.

 

I also understand the frustration of responsible Americans who pay their mortgages on time, file their tax returns every April 15th, and are reluctant to pay the cost of excesses on Wall Street.

 

But given the situation we are facing, not passing a bill now would cost these Americans much more later.

 

Many Americans are asking, how would a rescue plan work? After much discussion, there's now widespread agreement on the principles such a plan would include.

 

It would remove the risk posed by the troubled assets, including mortgage-backed securities, now clogging the financial system. This would free banks to resume the flow of credit to American families and businesses.

 

Any rescue plan should also be designed to ensure that taxpayers are protected. It should welcome the participation of financial institutions, large and small. It should make certain that failed executives do not receive a windfall from your tax dollars.

 

It should establish a bipartisan board to oversee the plan's implementation, and it should be enacted as soon as possible.

 

In close consultation with Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and SEC Chairman Chris Cox, I announced a plan on Friday.

 

First, the plan is big enough to solve a serious problem. Under our proposal, the federal government would put up to $700 billion taxpayer dollars on the line to purchase troubled assets that are clogging the financial system.

 

In the short term, this will free up banks to resume the flow of credit to American families and businesses, and this will help our economy grow.

 

Second, as markets have lost confidence in mortgage-backed securities, their prices have dropped sharply, yet the value of many of these assets will likely be higher than their current price, because the vast majority of Americans will ultimately pay off their mortgages.

 

The government is the one institution with the patience and resources to buy these assets at their current low prices and hold them until markets return to normal.

 

And when that happens, money will flow back to the Treasury as these assets are sold, and we expect that much, if not all, of the tax dollars we invest will be paid back.

 

The final question is, what does this mean for your economic future? Well, the primary steps -- purpose of the steps I've outlined tonight is to safeguard the financial security of American workers, and families, and small businesses. The federal government also continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money.

 

The Treasury Department recently offered government insurance for money market mutual funds. And through the FDIC, every savings account, checking account, and certificate of deposit is insured by the federal government for up to $100,000.

 

The FDIC has been in existence for 75 years, and no one has ever lost a penny on an insured deposit, and this will not change.

 

Once this crisis is resolved, there will be time to update our financial regulatory structures. Our 21st-century global economy remains regulated largely by outdated 20th-century laws.

 

Recently, we've seen how one company can grow so large that its failure jeopardizes the entire financial system.

 

Earlier this year, Secretary Paulson proposed a blueprint that would modernize our financial regulations. For example, the Federal Reserve would be authorized to take a closer look at the operations of companies across the financial spectrum and ensure that their practices do not threaten overall financial stability.

 

There are other good ideas, and members of Congress should consider them. As they do, they must ensure that efforts to regulate Wall Street do not end up hampering our economy's ability to grow.

 

In the long run, Americans have good reason to be confident in our economic strength. Despite corrections in the marketplace and instances of abuse, democratic capitalism is the best system ever devised.

 

It has unleashed the talents and the productivity and entrepreneurial spirit of our citizens. It has made this country the best place in the world to invest and do business. And it gives our economy the flexibility and resilience to absorb shocks, adjust, and bounce back.

 

Our economy is facing a moment of great challenge, but we've overcome tough challenges before, and we will overcome this one.

 

I know that Americans sometimes get discouraged by the tone in Washington and the seemingly endless partisan struggles, yet history has shown that, in times of real trial, elected officials rise to the occasion.

 

And together we will show the world once again what kind of country America is: a nation that tackles problems head on, where leaders come together to meet great tests, and where people of every background can work hard, develop their talents, and realize their dreams.

 

Thank you for listening. May God bless you.

 

 

 

View Article  Billboard Series

 

The modern billboard got its start in the late 1800s in a competitive rough-and-tumble billposter industry. The outdoor industry is now a multimedia, global operation where Viacom, Clear Channel, and Lamar are now the dominate players. This series examines how the billboard industry formed and developed, along with its controversies, excerpting heavily from Buyways by Catherine Gudis, 2004.  And what is the vision of the future of these advertising titans? Are you ready for Branded Cities, Digital Billboards, and Walking Billboards? It’s a growth industry.

 

 

Billboards - Late 1800s

 

Billboard Industry Forms an Association

 

Billboards Formulate Public Opinion

 

Billboards and World War I

 

Billboards Use of Modern Art

 

Billboards and the Culture of Mobility

 

Billboard Industry Consolidation

 

Billboard Opposition

 

Billboards and the Highway Beautification Act 1965

 

Billboards and Culture Jammers

 

Fictional Billboard Burner – Doc Sarvis

 

 

Personally, I detest outdoor advertising in all forms, and there’s no doubt that the world would be a better place if they were removed from the landscape.

 

 

Most famous of all New-Deal images is “After the Louisville Flood,” by photographer Margaret Bourke-White, which features black flood victims in line at a relief agency being virtually run down by the looming white family of the “American Way” billboard beside them

 

 

 

Work of culture jammer Ron English.